Skiing and "stable?" tumors

Craig's been skiing 4 times in the last few weeks! He's been going to Alta on the "ski free after 3" for just 1.5 hours but it's great for him to get out and be in the mountains and take a few runs. His good buddy Jason Thomas and son Jake have been his skiing buddies 3 of the times and Maddie and I went with them last Saturday. We're planning on going again today. It's amazing to think he can ski when 6 months ago he was barely walking. This is what Craig wants, just to enjoy life and not concentrate on the cancer all the time.

Speaking of cancer...I just can't stay off the subject. After our last appointment and Dr. Jones called the tumors "stable", we read the radiologists' report and the actual report isn't quite as rosy. The largest tumor in the right liver lobe has grown from 18.1 cm x 11.3 cm to 21.1 cm x 12.9 cm. This is just one of many tumors. We read this after the last appointment so I called Dr. Jones and asked how this is stable? She said anything under 20% growth is considered stable so at the appointment we are told "it's stable" to allay our fears? Or is it the easiest thing to say? It's made us question things and do some more of our own research. We are having a 2nd opinion this week from a Dr. (one of only two our insurance covers) in SLC who also treats pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. We need to see if we have any other options besides chemo which Craig will not do again. The chemo provides no quality of life and is not proven to do much for the cancer either. There is a drug called Sutent that is an oral chemo that Dr. Jones would like him to try but our insurance will not pay for it. It's shown great results in actually keeping the tumors stable for up to 6 months longer than regular chemo and has the benefit of stopping taking the pill if it makes him too sick where the chemoembolization is put in his body and doesn't wear off for months. We are now appealing insurance to approve this drug for the 3rd time. And speaking of insurance, the first chemo on July 8, 2009 which cost $27,000 has now been denied even though we have an explanation of benefits in August 2009 saying they approved it. So if you don't think we need a health care overhaul in this country, just call me and I'll give you an earful! Huntsman is trying to work out the insurance problem for us. IHC insurance is calling the procedure "experimental". I asked the person on the phone "if this is experimental, what do you suggest we do for pancreatic cancer?" She was a little taken back by my comment. I know it's not her problem but this is ridiculous. We would love to have a treatment for cancer that isn't experimental...it all is!